There's a Lake of Stew and of Whiskey Too

25th February 2026

She Rucy On My H-Mart Until I Cui

Asian American women are not good at writing. Most of them, anyway. The good ones are ethnonationalists and they like their anonymity. They come with their own baggage. Nobody likes a mouthy woman.

Anyway, an Asian woman wrote a bad short story again, and the internet is seething about it. Since the last time I posted on here, white people have been emboldened by Twitch streamers and fitness gurus who are afraid to eat McDonald's, to retake their rightful place as the Alexanders of the Earth. They're just waiting for the green light to do so. Should be any day now. In the meantime, they will be tweeting about how they are not bugmen during their lunch breaks.

Asian guys are, as always, mad that the Brooklyn-based MFA writer's boyfriend was white and not Asian. Had he been Asian, I'm sure the bros would have been able to find it within themselves to cry in H-Mart with her. But the boyfriend was white, so now they have to talk about how overplayed Rucy's literary motifs are. What are you? A fag?

For the record, I only got about halfway through Hatchling, and then I skimmed the rest. It was awful, obviously. She's a Wallace Stegner Fellow in fiction at Stanford University, whatever that means. She's supposed to write some dogshit and then ingratiate herself with another Writer of Color so they can write "A beautiful, haunting meditation on Asian American identity" in each other's jacket blurbs. It's forex for people with Bachelor's degrees.

Rucy did have a good line in there. Or, it was honest, which I can appreciate. "I wanted to be, unlike the last time I shared a roof with those who loved me—my parents—beheld rather than beholden. To exist and to owe nothing, except to myself." They keep telling you who they are, and you keep hoping there is some other way they can be. Rucy, and every other Asian American woman who writes chinkslop, believes freedom from any duty or obligation you have as a woman, an Asian, an Asian woman, is a moral victory as long as you kind of have complicated feelings about it. As they like to say, Asian women don't belong to anybody. There is a very morbid conclusion to that thought. We can look around to see where it has led us to. 

There is this expectation that this type of Asian American woman will eventually have to come around someday. In reality, they're just a certain type of person. Their inability to write about anything but their white boyfriends, how their parents don't really understand them, or how they feel about dating their white boyfriends doesn't really say much about them other than they have been severed from their people's past. They can only intellectualize what they believe is a conflict between their desire to preserve their bloodline (they call it traditions or culture) and their desire to catch syphilis at a beach or something. The former was never there to begin with. They are defined by a negative. They don't have a place in that throughline between us and the generations before us. Their kids will look like they're from Kazakhstan, and they will be named Kai Liao-Rosenberg. I'm sure they're genuinely nice and lovely people; they're just ghosts. We do not have a common future with them. Bloodline is a real thing.

If you love women, which you do, you kind of just have to accept them for what they are. They lack a useful sense of shame. They're idiots in their own, special way. I think it's charming sometimes. You don't have to like it, but you do have to stop them from pooping their pants in public. Our grandpas and their dads knew this. Kai Liao-Rosenberg's mom would probably say they were misogynists, I don't think she could say they were dumb.






17th March 2023

Ignore Them

If you've seen the videos, a new one every week, of Black people attacking Asian people, you might come to the conclusion that Black people are attacking Asian people. That they've been attacking us for quite some time. This is apparently the wrong conclusion to come to. An inflammatory and inherently violent conclusion to come to. Unfortunately, we can't trust our own eyes, and even if we could, we lack the expertise to put it all into context. Fortunately, we can be sure our media class will be right there with us to hold our hands and help us correctly interpret what we're seeing. We will be asked to analyze all the reasons why these attacks are occurring. We will be asked to meditate on the nuanced interplay between a clever constellation of weighty, academic concepts including, but not limited to: white supremacy, ’the carceral state’, misogyny, capitalism, not-leftist liberals, how your dad didn’t support BLM, the model minority myth, imperialism, media representation. If it appears that generating this requisite worldview to fully understand what we’re seeing seems like a surefire way to develop schizophrenia, there's no need to worry, our media class has already figured it out for you.

Get Out.

Away from the screeching. You can disengage from these 'debates' entirely. In the case of a black man stabbing a Korean woman 40 times in her own bathroom, why the guy did it, or the 'structural forces' that supposedly made this murder inevitable are irrelevant. Would Christina Lee’s death have been more or less palatable if we were certain that the man did it because he had some demons about Northeast Asian geopolitics? If he hated women? When the focus is shifted towards understanding this chain of 'root causes' leading up to the murder, Christina Lee's death becomes merely incidental. Unfortunate, no doubt, but you are then drawn to ask, “Isn't Assamad Nash also a victim?” Or, for the more politically deft, “Isn't he really just a symptom of a much larger problem? Given the complexity of the world we live in today, shouldn't we consider a more nuanced approach towards dealing with people like him?” No on both counts. Fry him.

The premise of the Model Minority Myth is that our parents kept their heads down, kept to themselves in insular ethnic enclaves, and worked hard without major, visible involvement in contemporary movements for social change. This made them vulnerable to be used by right wing forces as an ideological cudgel to delegitimize the demands of black and brown activist movements. They could not correct this cooption, could not exercise political power on behalf of their own interests nor of their minority brethren because they didn’t know any better. They were uninformed. Not about trivial matters, like say, civil engineering or how to provide for a family in a way so selfless our writers cry about it in supermarkets. Our parents didn’t know the language of liberation we take as gospel today. Magnanimously, we don’t always hate them for it, sometimes we pity them.

At the heart of the Harvard admissions scandal were 1st generation Chinese parents who felt that their children were being punished for their academic success. The ensuing backlash from our media class accused our parents of not taking into account the disparate effect the loss of affirmative action would have on black students. They were putting too much emphasis on Harvard; academics weren’t everything, other colleges were just as good. Our parents were once again playing into the Model Minority Myth. What made them so uniquely worthy of our contempt this time around was that they were acting, consciously, as if all of these considerations were irrelevant to them. They were acting without consulting with and learning from the right type of people. Instead, our parents went with what was best for their bottom line, which was what they perceived as the absolute well being of their families. When asked, “Do you want what's best for your children regardless of the political implications?” for better or for worse, they answered, “Yes.”

When you read our writers today, you will note an increasingly concerned tone, hinting that the Asian American 'community' is on the precipice of splintering off into two antagonistic groups. Actually, this split happened decades ago. Asian American is a misnomer not because he is Japanese and you are Cambodian. The competition is not between rich yellows and poor browns. It is between people who believe a community is self-complete and those who believe a community is ever expanding, on its way towards encompassing the whole of humanity.

It is why when the wrong type of Asian American civic group raises objections to New York County DA Alvin Bragg’s explicit commitment to impose a “presumption of pre-trial non-incarceration for every case” and actively avoid mandatory minimums, they are then directed to first ponder all the reasons why a habitual, violent offender who spent very little time in any sort of correctional institution might attack someone for no apparent reason. You see, if you really think about it, really listen to our academics and experts, the offender's aggression is just an extension of American imperial wars in Asia, a case of whiteness, somehow, some way, pitting minority against minority yet again. Endless reflections on how publicly identifying the murderer as a black man perpetuates the image of black criminality. How this might affect the hard won gains won by our fabled multiracial working class coalition fighting for racial solidarity and every other thing that is good in this world. Before you do anything, remember to consider everything first.

If you find this reasoning to be spineless and obscene, and you believe that Asian Americans being physically attacked is reason enough to say no to these masturbatory worldbuilding exercises, you’ll find yourself on the wrong side of the Asian American split. You are implying that our media class isn’t just wrong, but that they are unimportant to you. Your sympathy has human limits, their pride does not. You will be called a racist, a fascist, a misogynist, a house slave, an MRAsian, a pick-me. Then you will be told that you are overreacting if you object to being called these things. It is only natural that your higher ups, in all their moral clarity, tell the world what you really are. And while you unwisely prepare to explain yourself and prove why you are not these things, consider that nothing you say will change these people’s minds. They were going to call you that anyway. It’s their job.